Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 11:18

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
AI Plays, MercadoLibre Lead Five Stocks Near Buy Points - Investor's Business Daily
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why am I sweating so much at night even though my room is really cold?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Rays star Wander Franco hit with gun charge amid sexual abuse trial - New York Post
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Does any other guys get turned on by dick pic makes you lick lips because you what to suck?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
"Which K-pop idols do you find breathtakingly beautiful?"
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
SpaceX launches 500th orbital Falcon rocket on 15th anniversary of the Falcon 9 - Spaceflight Now